Discussion/ Analysis Question Samples from Indige Essays - Rhetoric

Discussion/ Analysis Question: Samples from Indigenous Orators Red Eagle William Weatherford of the Creek acceptance of his fate as a captive soldier while mourning for the misfortune of his nation. He believes that there no way of saving his people unless they are willing to step down to negotiate and save the last remnant of their country and he is willing to enforce this. He creates a persona of defeated warrior while still keeping his pride and beliefs intact. Stating his speech with confidence, he is able to show how though he fights the reasons he believes in which is deserving of respect in all cultures. He is also showing to be reasonable while accepting his nation's fate and always having its best interest at heart. Tone words such as "power" shows the acknowledgement of power and position. "Obedience" was another word that has a harsh connotation of obeying without having a choice, which is the case with him. Joseph Brant (Thayendanega) Joseph Brant Annotate Spotted Tail For his empathy techniques, he uses "My fellow" which creates an ingroup bias with the audience he is talking to. He repeats this over and over again throughout the speech to validate that they are in the same group, have the same values and care about the same things. He uses the Rogerian model when he tries to seek common ground between the group that he is talking to and his own group. For example he talks about the fact that both group, "have the thoughts and desires in that respect that the white people have. The thesis of this speech comes at the very end, when he states, "When people come to trouble it is better for both parties to come together without arms, to talk it over, and find some peaceful way to settle." He uses ethos to create a common group between the two opposing sides. Keokuk He uses empathy techniques such as creating a common group with his audience. He also relates to his audiences by showing concern and care for them. Using language such as "half our country is at war," he makes it more an an urgent subject. His use of empathy was extremely effective at communicating that he is a person that they can trust and and empathize, making his opinions seem more legitimate and pronounce. Another technique he uses is speaking to ethos. He makes examples such as the different ways they have lied and cheated, showing how the actions of the other party is not ethical. He also says how he tried to make peace with them but they are not willing to listen. He also appeals to pathos by tell the audience stories about his experiences, working with the other party. He says how they killed his close friend and how they say they are good men while lying and cheating. The tone he uses communicates the dire situation using harsh words such as "revenge" and "falsehoo d. He positions himself as a person who is willing to take action and require help to do so. He positions as a leader by asserting confidences in his words and actions. He uses words such as, "I" and "you" to show his dominance and position in the situation. This creates an emotional barrier between his audience and himself. He uses the words "they" while referring to his opponent with disdain, making it seem like if his audience didn't agree with him, they would become the people he disliked too. Compared to Stephen Harper's speech, Keokuk gets to the point quickly and effectively. It has a huge difference in tone. One was an apologetic tone with Stephen Harper explaining and acknowledging all the wrong the government has done to the people. There was not much of an emotional appeal. The other one was about accusing and attacking all the wrong the white people did and why they needed to be dealt with. Keokuk was able to deliver a much more impactful speech to his audience than Stephen Harper because of these differences. He used much more pathos and told stories of the wrongs they have done to him and his people. Chief Joseph Vine Deloria In Chief